Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by AnthonyMouse 250 days ago
It takes active work to do that but not to manually approve zillions of individual installations?
1 comments

The zillions of individual installations probably aren't actually getting approved, manually or otherwise.
Not if the purpose of the regulations is to thwart them, no. But those are the rules that ought not to be.
Purpose, ought, shouldn't, shouldn't, sense. These are words of minimal relevance to regulations and bureaucracy, which have internal incentive structures that rarely align with any kind of human morality.
Suppose that it isn't literally impossible to affect what the rules are and then if we're going to attempt it we need to determine what they ought to be.
"Need."
If you want the rules that exist and the rules that ought to exist to get closer together, do you not need to reckon what they ought to be?