[xpe]

The author, Eric Hartford, wrote:

> Strip away the inflammatory language

Where is the claimed inflammatory language? I've read the report. It is dry, likely boring to many.

[rainsford]

Ironically there is a lot of inflammatory language in the blog post itself that seems unjustified given the source material.

[XMPPwocky]

I also can't help but note that this blog post itself seems (first to my own intuition and heuristics, but also to both Pangram and GPTZero) to be clearly LLM-generated text.

[themafia]

I hate to be overly simplistic, but:

NIST doesn't seem to have a financial interest in these models.

The author of this blog post does.

This dichotomy seems to drive most of the "debate" around LLMs.

[SilverElfin]

Honestly, I think this article is itself the hit piece (against NIST or America). And it is the one with inflammatory language.

[spaceballbat]

Isn’t America currently killing its citizens with its own military? I would trust them even less now.

[Max-Limelihood]

They're not, and I think you should trust whoever told you that even less now.