|
|
|
|
|
by crazygringo
261 days ago
|
|
> current data points are much more valuable than historical data points, so storing old data doesn't have much incentives Not true -- advertising profiles are vastly more valuable when based on a lifetime of data. > also by having ability to enable/disable access to your data, you have the power of who gets what But realistically, when are you ever going to disable access? If you want people to be able to read your replies no matter what social network they're using, you're going to make those replies available to every social network. > and for which purpose
also reselling of your data should become illegal to start with This is my point. The solution here is legal, not technological. Personal data storage doesn't change anything legally, and changing the law would prevent reselling even if you didn't have personal data storage. It seems important not to confuse the two, in order not to give people false hopes. |
|
Solid idea is more in line with revolution and demand for our representatives to give their people internet that can push the humanity forward, and not just let us waist countless hours on doom scrolling.