Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by D-Coder 255 days ago
There are probably 37,392 papers on this. So your "should" is probably just impossible for humans.
1 comments

This is such a ridiculous argument. They could have read five papers, couldn’t they?
Picking up five needles is trivial. Picking up five needles in 50000 haystacks is difficult.
How do they know which five papers to read?