At least in the thread linked here, it seems like his maintainership over the project is legitimate, which makes it wrong to characterize him as "forcing" his ways on anyone.
Even ignoring that examples of his behavior are easily found elsewhere, the link itself shows him completely disregarding feedback from other contributors to force his own way.
Honestly, I can't understand the intent behind such a defensive rebuttal to the criticism of his actions.
My point wasn't about javascript. He got pushback because he ignored everyone and just did his own thing.
It has nothing to do with javascript and you can see that in the link. That's a weird excuse.
Honestly, I can't understand the intent behind such a defensive rebuttal to the criticism of his actions.