|
|
|
|
|
|
by freshhawk
5015 days ago
|
|
|
"I also agree where he said any legal start up is fine and free of guilt" Really? The law, for very good reason, lags behind societal developments and shifts in social norms. Conflating "legal" with "ethical" shows a pretty profound misunderstanding of the two concepts. |
|
|
Some exist, like Greenpeace perhaps, in the ethical if not always legal. i suggest the British System sits there too.
But we argue here not over what is legal but what is ethical. Many things are agreed upon worldwide as unethical, rape murder etc. But a whole raft of other issues are ethical preferences - selling mortgages to high risk payers with two year low rates. It's legal. It may be ethical. Do you agree?
Btw I used legal there as the usual, large intersection meaning, as I think most of us do in daily lives