|
|
|
|
|
by sauercrowd
261 days ago
|
|
It's a good question, and I don't think answered sufficiently in the recent sqlite hype. In my opinion if you have an easy way to run postgres,MySQL,... - just run that. There's usually a lot of quirks in the details of DB usage (even when it doesn't immediately seem like it - got bitten by it a few times). Features not supported, different semantics, ... IMO every project has an "experimental stuff" budget and if you go over it it's too broken to recover, and for most projects there's just not that much to win by spending them on a new database thing |
|
This is an interesting take; why do you see recent hype around the most boring and stone-age of technologies, SQLite?