[zahlman]

^ This is important. People pay thousands for reasons related to due diligence, liability and legitimacy, not because they struggle with fancy uses of English. (Contract drafters are often advised to avoid certain stereotypical formulas.)

[jqpabc123]

This is the premise behind *legal* licensing of professionals --- like doctors and lawyers and engineers.

AI doesn't really offer anything new here.

It has always been possible to get these jobs done faster and cheaper --- if you're willing to ignore a few little nagging issues like quality and liability and *legality*.

Review of legal contracts is not just about what is being said but also what should be said that isn't.

Can AI do this level of analysis as well as a licensed professional? Color me skeptical. But as always, your mileage may vary.

[sumanthchary]

LegalDeep AI isn't build for replacing the Licensed Professionals, it's build for making there life easier and increasing there productivity. This tool might save there time and money.

LegalDeep AI just gives you summaries and analysis not perfect data to share with clients without review by user himself. They can use this for help.

[jqpabc123]

So it is mainly for use by *lawyers*?

This contradicts your original post where you appear to suggest it can be used to avoid paying lawyers. Along with the fact that you are posting in a technical forum rather than a legal one.