[Yenrabbit]

We made the tool, and that will eventually be available on its own. But the method requires some discipline and 'unlearning'. It's very hard to show someone an AI tool and not have them treat it just like ChatGPT/Claude/... - that's the part that takes the time, and having a community of people working through different examples and case studies together is a lot more motivating for this than just staring at an empty prompt box :)

[pedalpete]

That's a good explanation, but I think the expectation when someone says they are "launching something" that is an antidote to AI fatigue, it may be better to say it's a course and a methodology. You aren't launching a tool.

[eries]

I think if you give it a try, you'll be surprised. It is a course and a tool and a way of thinking. We often struggle to find concise language to describe something that is fundamentally new. Maybe after you've tried it, you'll be able to help us explain it better.

[pedalpete]

I'm deep in category creation myself, so I know exactly where you're at.

But as I'm sure you know, you need to get the language right in order to create the desire to try.

I don't personally have AI fatigue. Nor do I have the time to spend 5 weeks taking a course to use a tool that I don't have enough context for.

Being in Australia timezone wise, and launching a start-up doesn't help.

This doesn't mean in any way that I'm not rooting for your success. But as you know, the language of understanding something new is a long iterative process.