|
|
|
|
|
|
by gregates
255 days ago
|
|
|
Anyone who's watched an episode of Star Trek can recognize that, if you give non-zero probability to the chance that we develop artificial intelligence smarter than us, that carries some risk. The part of the argument that people disagree with is what we should do about that, and there it can actually matter what numbers you put on the likelihoods of different outcomes. It's the conclusion "We should dump trillions of dollars into AI research, something something, less risk" that people disagree with. Not the premise. |
|
|
Literally this thread shows that there are many people who refuse to accept the premise of any risk.