[noosphr]

> His books, many of which are annotated with margin comments,

I'm not saying that he did, but this along with being the right age to have read How to Read a Book by Mortimer J. Adler strongly suggest that he used that book to grasp a lot more of his books than most people can.

That book gives you a very good strategy for reading books that are beyond you normally. In the three years since I've read it I've managed to finish books that I couldn't read even when I was doing my PhD and it was my full time job to understand them.

The funny thing is that I only ran into that book when I was trying to figure out how to build knowledge graphs for complex documents using LLMs. Using multiple readings to create a summary of each chunk, then a graph of the connections between the chunks, then a glossary of all the terms and finally a critique of each chunk gave better than sota results for the documents I was working on.

[chompychop]

Where can I read more about your research? Knowledge graphs interest me.

[noosphr]

Drop me a line on my profiles email.

I'm playing around with using hyperlinks in pdfs to get around how much the www sucks for posting serious research with serious working code.

Caveat emptor: I'm first working on getting the basic groundwork out, like a pipeline that shows what you need to do to extract a scanned pdf in a quality that tesseract can actually get text out of.

[cxr]

> I'm first working on getting the basic groundwork out, like a pipeline that shows what you need to do to extract a scanned pdf in a quality that tesseract can actually get text out of.

Sounds like TBL's contribution doesn't suck so much after all.

[posterguy]

I'm curious why you think that "strongly suggests" anything?