|
|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
267 days ago
|
|
|
> This is from a dissenting opinion of a US Supreme Court justice No, its dicta which neither was part of the substantive ruling nor an accurate description of pre-existing law from the Court’s opinion (which was unanimous, so there was no “dissenting opinion”) in a case that has since been overruled and is notorious for having allowed an egregious restriction on core political speech. |
|
|