|
|
|
|
|
|
by oreally
266 days ago
|
|
|
Well I'd have to pay all the friction of writing up a new type, and in some cases the type gets cubersome. Doubly so if your codebase requires extra some friction like 1 header for each type. Also get over it. We got post-processor things like static analyzers, etc, and whatever AI code reminders/fixers that are coming up next. I'd prefer those over muddying up the code base. |
|
|
Sure. But unless it's part of compiler, someone will not run it, or will run out of resources (no net or no tokens).
Defaults matter a ton.