[Dylan16807]

> I mean, take a 100 minute movie, sliced into 1-second clips. 8kB is not even enough to store all possible orders you could put those clips in.

Using a low hurdle to show it still failing is a good rhetorical technique, but you lowered your hurdle too far here. Yes technically specifying the order of 6000 segments takes more than 8KB. Because it takes 8.14KB. That's a rounding error. What could have been a useful argument is now a nitpick. And what if the movie was only 98 minutes, now it fits? What a mixed message.

It's a good reference point, but I'd replace "is not even enough" with "would only be enough".

[mdemare]

8kb to specify the order of the clips, but not a single bit is used to describe a single pixel of a single frame.

[Dylan16807]

Yes. That's why it's "only enough to".