[randycupertino]

I was recently in a work AI training where we were encouraged to have AI review all our vendor and contractor budgets and find holes and create rebuttals to line items. Was wondering what if the vendor has ai review our rebuttals and create counter-points to our ai-created arguments. At some point it will just be AI talking against itself to another AI chatbot.

[Terr_]

> At some point it will just be AI talking against itself to another AI chatbot.

And then something like this [0] will happen, creating a weird wasteful meta-game about the model(s) used by each company.

It makes intuitive sense: If you outsourced "generate awesome assertions" to a contractor, then someone else hired the same contractor to "judge the awesomeness of these assertions", they are more likely to get lots of "awesome" results—whether they're warranted or not. The difference might even come down to quirks of word-choice and formatting which a careful human inspector would judge irrelevant.

[0] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/03/ai_hiring_biased/

[discordance]

I anticipate a time when two negotiating parties will give their negotiation points and red lines to their agents, and the negotiations will wholly take place between their representative agents.

[ethbr1]

> At some point it will just be AI talking against itself to another AI chatbot.

As anyone in the US healthcare insurance claims-adjacent spaces can tell you: yes, in about 2 years.