|
|
|
|
|
by AngryParsley
5022 days ago
|
|
It's not getting paid twice. The reason there's no option for "free with ads" is because ads have diminishing returns. Each extra ad you show makes customers less likely to buy a given product. Advertisers won't pay as much if they're part of a giant block of ads. For the company to get the same amount of money, the trade-off curve looks something like this: Pay $x, see 0 ads. Pay $0.75x, see 1 ad. Pay $0.5x, see 4 ads. Pay $0.25x, see 20 ads. Pay $0, see 50 ads. Some customers prefer to pay with their eyes instead of their wallets. You don't like to do that. I don't like to do that. But it's fine that companies give us the choice. Also, you pay for broadcast TV? |
|