[pancakemouse]

Something I've seen discussed very little is that Claude Code can be opened in a directory tree of any type of document you like (reports, spreadsheets, designs, papers, research, ...) and you can play around in all sorts of ways. Anthropic themselves hint at this by saying their whole organisation uses it, but the `Code` moniker is probably limiting adoption. They could release a generalised agent with a friendlier UI tomorrow and get much wider workplace adoption.

[withinboredom]

I have it master my music. I drop all the stems in a folder, tell it what I want, and off it goes to write a python script specifically for the album. It’s way better than doing it in the DAW, which usually takes me hours (or days in some cases). It can get it to 90% in minutes, only requiring some fine-tuning at the end.

[spamboy]

Wow, could you expand on this? What kind of effects can you get out of it? I’m somewhat skeptical that this could even come close to a proper mastering chain, so I’d be extremely interested to learn more :)

[withinboredom]

Any effect you can imagine. It could probably write a DAW if you wanted it to, but a “one-off” script? Easy. I think the best thing is when I tell it something like “it sounds like there is clipping around the 1:03 mark” it will analyze it, find the sign flip in the processor chain, and apply the fix. It’s much faster at this than me.

Note that there needs to be open source libraries and toolings. It can’t do a Dolby Atmos master, for example. So you still need a DAW.

[spamboy]

That's fascinating. I generally mix in-the-box, so my mixes are close to commercially-ready before mastering, but I've experimented with a few of the "one-click" mastering solutions and they just haven't been it for me (Ozone's presets, Landr, Distrokid.) I've currently been using Logic's transparent mode as a one-click master which has been slightly better, but this sounds really compelling. I generally just want 16-bit 48 KHz masters anyway, so no need for Atmos. I'll have to try this out. Thanks for sharing!

[tkgally]

That’s how I use it. I’m not a developer, and using Claude Code with Git turned out to be more complicated than I wanted. Now I just give it access to a folder on my Mac, put my prompt and any associated files in that folder, and have it work there. It works fine for my needs.

I would like a friendlier interface than the terminal, though. It looks like the “Imagine with Claude” experiment they announced today is a step in that direction. I’m sure many other companies are working on similar products.

[matlock]

Over the weekend I had it extract and Analyse Little but Fierce, a simplified and kid friendly DnD 5e and extract markdown files that help me DMing for my kids. Then it Analyse No, thank you evil as I want to base the setting on it but with LBF rules. And then have the markdown turn into nice looking pdfs. Claude code is so much more than coding and it’s amazing.

[clbrmbr]

Indeed. I’m having success using it as a tool for requirements querying. (When a sales person asks “does product A have feature X” I can just ask Claude because I’ve got all the requirements in markdown files.