|
|
|
|
|
by blub
268 days ago
|
|
It is broader since it applies to things which can be perceived visually, but does not apply to any random creative activity. The list is finite and programming is not on it. Furthermore, taste in one area is more likely to manifest in other areas. Somebody that has good taste in fashion would likely have good taste in interior decoration or art. > Secondly, having good taste and being able to apply it is also wildly different. I can recognize what looks good in fashion or paintings without being myself able to achieve that. Ok, but applying it is the interesting part. > Thirdly, there's really no such thing as a "normal human". The longer you live, assuming you're willing to actually examine your experiences, the more you'll learn that the trite expression "everyone is unique" really is accurate. The things that make individuals truly unique are often irrelevant in the greater scheme. One could draw a line across continents and ages to connect quite similar people. |
|