[brap]

I know you probably don’t want an LLM in your decompiler, but assigning meaningful names could be a good task for an LLM.

[Hackbraten]

There’s some prior art on this [0] [1], and it’s worked decently well for me on obfuscated JS.

[0]: https://thejunkland.com/blog/using-llms-to-reverse-javascrip...

[1]: https://github.com/jehna/humanify/blob/main/README.md#exampl...

[viraptor]

It's also good as picking up patterns which are common enough, but may not be known to everyone. For example I couldn't tell that some function was doing CRC via a lookup table - but Claude knew.

[BobbyTables2]

Often googling the first few entries of such tables will show CRC implementations. Same for SHA hash constants…

[viraptor]

The tables depend on the CRC parameters and in my case there would be no Google hits - a unique setup was used.

[cogman10]

That'd make sense if the jar is obfuscated. Java preserves method and class names by default.

[p0w3n3d]

One day I was using ghidra to decompile something to find out how it works, and the LLM helped a lot. It was a game changer in refactoring of the decompiled assembly-that-looked-like-c language.