|
|
|
|
|
by lolive
261 days ago
|
|
Exactly, I have never seen such codes [*]. Probably because the adoption of the generics has been absolutely massive in the last 20 years.
And I expect the same thing to eventually happen with Typescript and [typed] Python. [*]: nor have I seen EJB1 or even EJB2. Spring just stormed them, in the last 20 years. |
|