[jgb1984]

There is nothing python-2 about my python-3 dynamically typed code. I'm pretty confident a majority of new python code is still being written without type hints.

Hell, python type annotations were only introduced in python 3.5, the language was 24 years old by then! So no, the way I write python is the way it was meant to be, type hints are the gadget that was bolted on when the language was already fully matured, it's pretty ridiculous painting code without type hints as unpythonic, that's the world upside down.

If I wanted to write very verbose typed code I would switch to Go or Rust. My python stays nimble, clean and extremely readable, without type hints.

[pansa2]

I agree completely! To be clear, I don’t consider describing code as “Python 2-style” to be a bad thing. It’s how I describe my own Python code!

Overall, I have found very few Python 3 features are worth adopting (one notable exception is f-strings). IMO most of them don’t pull their weight, and many are just badly designed.

[dragonwriter]

> Hell, python type annotations were only introduced in python 3.5

Mypy was introduced with support for both for Python 2.x and 3.x (3.2 was the current) using type comments before Python introduced a standard way of using Python 3.0’s annotation syntax for typing; even when type annotations were added to Python proper, some uses now supported by them were left to mypy-style type comments in PEP 484/Python 3.5, with type annotations for variables added in PEP 526/Python 3.6.