|
|
|
|
|
by bediger4000
262 days ago
|
|
In fact, in "Thirty Years Later: Lessons from the Multics Security Evaluation" by Paul Karger and Roger Schell, having a stack growing up is given a lot of credit: "Third, stacks on the Multics processors grew in the
positive direction, rather than the negative direction.
This meant that if you actually accomplished a buffer
overflow, you would be overwriting unused stack frames,
rather than your own return pointer, making exploitation
much more difficult." https://www.acsac.org/2002/papers/classic-multics.pdf |
|