Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by itake 260 days ago
Yeah, it seems like you’d want to buy bonds that covers areas that you’re not personally in…
1 comments

Why? It's not like you can influence the trigger of any such catastrophe
Same principle as why many people prefer not to own shares in the company that employs them -- you're already heavily exposed to that specific risk and don't want to add more. If you live in Florida then a hurricane in Florida already might mean financial loss for you if it damages your house, so buying a CAT bond that covers a different thing is more diversified risk: you might get "house is trashed" or "bond is total loss" but at least you probably will not get both at once.
I understand, it's risk diversification.