[rkagerer]

Thanks for sharing your insight. Wouldn't hurt from a proofread. There are some typos / wrong words, that detract from the sense of authority lent by the article. Eg:

"It's clear that we this structure" --> with

"with out those protections in place" --> without

"Investors would be best to limit their exposer to losses beyond their investment" --> exposure

There might have been others, I had to go back and skim to summarize for you.

[rrjjww]

Thank you! No matter how many times I read things over I managed to leave a few behind. I will make those edits shortly.