[xattt]

I went down their rabbit hole, and a conventional tech CT is 10 hours??

[kg]

My understanding is that material composition can make a CT scan take a really long time. It makes sense to me that scanning a battery would be pretty slow, given what they're made out of.

[xattt]

I just assumed it would be impractical due to physical changes of the object from multi-hour exposure to X-ray energy.

[kragen]

I don't think ionizing atoms inside a battery will harm it. They don't have DNA.

[adwn]

I don't know about batteries, but ionizing radiation can definitely permanently damage microelectronics, and those don't have DNA either.

[VectorLock]

Thankfully functionality isn't usually necessary to get a successful scan, unlike living targets.

[kragen]

It can, yes, but batteries also don't have microelectronics.

[habi]

Metal objects don’t change that much due to the radiation.

[habi]

That is possible, especially for very high resolution scans and dense materials.

I work with (other) desktop microCT scanners and the longest scan we did took longer than 40 hours.