|
|
|
|
|
|
by kube-system
263 days ago
|
|
|
The Clinton admin was successful in the 90s. They cut costs enough to pull the US entirely out of the deficit. They did things slowly and methodically over 5 years, making sure the things they cut were unnecessary before cutting them. They also followed the law, avoiding the legal issues and consequential costs that DOGE is incurring. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_policy_of_the_Clinton... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Partnership_for_Reinv... Federal spending is up during this administration, the deficit is at modern-day averages, and the bills recently passed by this administration are going to increase it even further. The slash-and-burn style of cuts that DOGE is sloppy and ineffective. They are Chesterton's fencing themselves -- cutting things that they later find to be important. And on the other hand, not spending the time to actually seek out waste that is hard to find. A tech company works very differently than the government does, and they are slowly starting to discover that the hard way. |
|
|
Which is incredibly ironic for people who claim to be "conservative."