[dominicrose]

This is unrelated to Ruby and the author is against free speech because he wants to professionaly censor someone because of his work-unrelated opinions.

Plus there are perfectly valid reasons to prefer some categories of people over others. It has nothing to do with hate or fascism, it's only natural.

I'm a DINK (double-income no kids) and I don't feel the hate of DDH, I only see someone who thinks it's worthwhile to be a parent and it's a dead end not to be. It's technically true and you can't argue against that anyway.

[pmdr]

Wait, people are complaining about his views on having children now?

[dominicrose]

TBH my comment was a reaction to the tiniest bit of the article. The author just HAD to add this part after all the rest didn't he?

[jemiluv8]

Hilarious

[pmdr]

I mean, what's the take here? Discrimination against people who can't have children? Hatred towards those who won't? Did he only encourage people of a certain race to have children?

I remember listening to some interviews/podcasts where he discussed this. I don't have children myself, but I did not detect any malice in his arguments.

[jemiluv8]

Neither did I and that was why I found the whole thing rather hilarious. This is not even a discussion