|
|
|
|
|
|
by gf000
261 days ago
|
|
|
I mean, CS is famously bad at exact definitions [1]. Why should we have one for what a PL is? Just do what humans have been doing for millenia, how is it commonly used. A tomato is a vegetable from a culinary perspective, and HTML is not a PL based on its use case and its literal name. [1] what is a low or high level language? Strongly typed language? |
|
|