|
|
|
|
|
by viraptor
267 days ago
|
|
> In practice, attackers often find ways around those measures I really don't see this as a good explanation. You can say that about any security measure, but we can't keep slapping more layers that check the previous layer. At some point that action itself will cause issues. > for example, through misconfigured deployments, command injection, supply chain attacks, or overly broad privileges. Those don't apply if the file owner is not the app runner or the filesystem is read-only. If you can change the file in that case, you can disable the check. Same for misconfiguration and command injection. > For example, PCI DSS Ah, BS processes. Just say it's about that up front. |
|