|
|
|
|
|
|
by n_u
263 days ago
|
|
|
Ah yeah that makes sense. I guess if you are only using replica for fault tolerance and not as a read-replica then it seems semi-synchronous replication is strictly better than synchronous replication. I suppose in semi-sync the failover will take a little longer but it's probably inconsequential. Thanks! |
|
|