|
|
|
|
|
by ashikns
265 days ago
|
|
This is what I have struggled to understand about Zig. It seems pretty much like C in a mental model aspect - you are responsible for everything. It's slightly better than C, but C already runs on everything on the planet and can be made secure even if painfully so. So what niche is Zig aiming to fill? |
|
also operators and integer types are unambiguous, and there is no UB in safe compilation modes.
It's arguably much better than C, not "slightly better than C"