Intellectually dishonest argumentation cannot avoid ending in falsehood. By design it grows to consume all available time.
A walled garden, if constructed in good faith, has at least the potential to find truth.
I suspect that we're really both just contrasting best-case and worst-case scenarios for our preferred positions. What ends up actually happening is a mix of both.
Intellectually dishonest argumentation cannot avoid ending in falsehood. By design it grows to consume all available time.
A walled garden, if constructed in good faith, has at least the potential to find truth.
I suspect that we're really both just contrasting best-case and worst-case scenarios for our preferred positions. What ends up actually happening is a mix of both.