| > You later mention "boundaries of bodies" You claimed the mother has authority over the life of the baby, because its body is part of her. I don't think that is true, thus I quoted you a definition for body boundaries. > There has always been a clash between morality and science. Science always wins. Weird statement. There is a fight between a compiler and a memory model. The compiler always wins. You claimed, because it is possible to perform abortion now, it should be moral automatically. > is dangerous b/c if someone wants to delete your authority they can merely delete you. Exactly the argument why "deleting" someone is immoral without pointing to religion. > So you believe the Romans killed Jesus and Peter? Yes? Palestine was a roman province, so only the procurator could order executions. Petrus was a roman citizen so could demand to be judged by the emperor in Rome, which he did, so he got executed in Rome. |
No, I did not. I don't believe in "life" - it's a nonscientific concept.
1718627440 sez> There is a fight between a compiler and a memory model.<
There is no "fight": both are present, one completes it's task, neither "wins".
1718627440 sez>"Petrus was a roman citizen..." <
and other stuff he read in some text written by religious fanatics thousands of years ago (and randomly amended by other fanatics since).<*
"Nothing to see here, move on, move on please,..." - Frank Drebin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSjK2Oqrgic