[foobarbecue]

Can't help noticing, in the original article:

> The entire attack design assumes Linux or macOS execution environments, checking for os.platform() === 'linux' || 'darwin'. It deliberately skips Windows systems

If I were the conspiracy-minded sort I might jump to some wild conclusions here.

[chatmasta]

Whoever made the exploit probably doesn’t use windows.

[acomjean]

I’m using windows again. By default windows has “power shell” which is not at all like bash and is (how do I say this diplomatically)… wanting.

I mean it says something the developed the Linux Subsystem for Windows, but it’s an optional install.

[stockresearcher]

I watched an interview with Jeff Snover once and he said that they tried to make a unixy bash-like shell a few times and decided it was never going to fit in Windows. So they went a different way and took a lot of inspiration from OpenVMS.

So don’t expect PowerShell to be like a UNIX shell. It isn’t, and wasn’t meant to be one. It’s different, on purpose :)

[jahsome]

What dont you like about powershell?

I'm a die hard linux user, and some years ago took a windows gig on a whim. I find powershell fantastic and the only thing that makes my role bearable. Now, one of the first things i install on Linux is powershell.

[philipwhiuk]

The awk equivalents in power-shell are horrific.

[jahsome]

You don't find awk itself horrific in its own way?

[vips7L]

Powershell is amazing. Just don't expect it to be posix. Using objects and structured data is leagues better than string parsing in posix shells imo.