Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Bullfight2Cond 278 days ago
That's a very self-limiting viewpoint when a significant portion of warfare is deception, so by definition you're not going to get "all we know".

For example, Seymour Hersh (renowned wartime investigative journalist), published a brief on US involvement: https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the...
1 comments
nradov 278 days ago
That article has been thoroughly debunked. Seymour Hersh just made things up with no fact checking or hard evidence.
link
Bullfight2Cond 278 days ago
What's your counter evidence?
link
nradov 278 days ago
No counter evidence is needed because Hersh hasn't actually presented any legitimate evidence in the first place.
link
normalaccess 278 days ago
If 'no counter-evidence is needed' were valid, we could dismiss anything we don't like without argument.

AKA: Argument from ignorance

link