| Fine. Then how about Japan-domiciled Panasonic [0][1] and Toyota [2], as well as (South Korean) Samsung and Stellantis' gigafactory [3]? You didn't see similar persistent flouting of labor and immigration laws despite all 3 being lead by Asian (and in some cases Korean) companies with similar organizational structures. Hyundai played it fast and loose. If Samsung SDI can open a gigafactory in the US while following US laws, why can't Hyundai? Just because ICE was extremely heavy-handed does NOT absolve or give Hyundai-LG the right to break American labor or immigration laws, or ask for special treatment. Even Biden bluntly told Hyundai leadership to "Hire American" [4] following pushback over this plant. [0] - https://na.panasonic.com/news/panasonic-energy-begins-mass-p... [1] - https://www.desotoks.us/394/Panasonic-Electric-Vehicle-Batte... [2] - https://www.toyota.com/usa/operations/map/tbmnc [3] - https://news.samsungsdi.com/global/articleView?seq=36 [4] - https://www.ft.com/content/c677b9aa-2e89-4feb-a56f-f3c8452b3... |
My understanding is that it is fairly common practice for foreign companies to send experts from their home countries in order to do knowledge transfer, since the skill set isn’t available domestically.
https://x.com/_mm85/status/1964631794260857114