|
|
|
|
|
by incomingpain
279 days ago
|
|
This article was a good read but having been written in 1992, it completely misses the 2009 inflection point and subsequent polarization. Which has more recently resulted in becoming extremely violent for politics. Now the definitions are even worse than the article proposes. It's clear that the definitions are being abused intentionally. This is the death of a political definition, I cant give it a label, see OP. It will become a religion after this; only then will we have the violence end in our politics. I would say the EU pact from 1997 was brilliant. They had to have known of the human costs; but it's over now. We've seen the end. Mind you, yes, there's stillpain to come; but it's too big. I'm predicting, since history is repeating for like the 6th time, we're still about 10 years out on the end of political violence. |
|