|
|
|
|
|
|
by simianwords
276 days ago
|
|
|
It provides sources that you can look up if you are using it in the app. But in twitter: the simple fact that a lot of people don't seem to understand is that AI is actually really factually accurate - way more than you can expect from a normal person. I have seen very very few egregious errors from Grok and most of the factually incorrect posts seem to be caught by it. For the ones that I Grok was incorrect - I verified it myself and I was wrong and Grok was right. It turns out that Grok is actually really reliable. But the limitations are that it can't fact check extremely niche topics or intricate posts. But 90% of the cases it does catch them. Edit: it also makes cute errors like this sometimes https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-buzz/grok-ai-mistak... |
|
|
Grok provides clear value here: obvious false information is easily countered. You can see how it easily convinces anyone casually looking at this post. Once they see grok's fact checks they usually believe grok - without it they might leave the post thinking the original post was true. This is immense value in my opinion.