[crinkly]

Best to strike production capability than pay for missiles to shoot them down.

[pjc50]

There is still a taboo against a nuclear weapons state directly striking another nuclear weapons state, under its own flag.

[HarHarVeryFunny]

Why would you need a nuke to take out a drone factory? There's lots of ways to disrupt production, starting with super low-tech things like drone attacks, assuming you have the intelligence to know where they are being produced.

[AlecSchueler]

> Why would you need a nuke to take out a drone factory?

They didn't suggest you would need to.

> low-tech things like drone attack drones

And which flag are they flying?

[HarHarVeryFunny]

> And which flag are they flying?

Sure, use tiny NATO flags if you like, but an "are you one of us" transponder might be better.

[KptMarchewa]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_82_bomb

[crinkly]

Might want to check the French position there. But you don’t need nuclear weapons to take out munitions factories.

[hollerith]

>you don’t need nuclear weapons to . . .

GP never implied that the strikes he refers to are nuclear strikes.

[crinkly]

I am GP :)

[hollerith]

I meant GP (grandparent) relative my comment.

[ponector]

Like India striking Pakistan? Or vice versa?

[tim333]

It's hard to take out factories. The UK did a lot of bombing of German factories in WW2 and production still went up.

[fpoling]

Russia stockpiles drones.

[crinkly]

Blow those up too.