|
|
|
|
|
by AbstractH24
288 days ago
|
|
But advocating for the struggles of one group and not another shouldn’t make one bad. The whole idea of intersectionality makes it hard to build coalitions and turns everything into a problem that’s impossibly complex to solve and difficult to build a coalition around. It’s the basic reason many leaders who the majority of a country dislike rise to power. Because that majority can’t put their differences aside. |
|
He didn't advocate for but against. He advocated against people who weren't his version of correct. He advocated for suppression, not liberation.
I don't think you're saying he advocated for the struggles of any marginalized group, but your comment could be read as such.
Charlie Kirk was a bigot who wanted his political "enemies" to suffer.