Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by UncleMeat 286 days ago
The point is that the annual number is often rather confusing from a reporting perspective.
2 comments

And that an annual number is diluted and will only feed in slowly over time.

If we knew inflation was permanently at 5% from now on, a blend with 2% for 11 months and 5% for 1 month, is not informative.

Pointless observation.
They said: "12*0.4% is 4.8%. Inflation is running at an annualised 4.8%."

This is patently wrong.

Because it's 1.04^12?

Or are you addressing some other flaw?