Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by npteljes 284 days ago
It's not an uncharitable interpretation, but a literal one. Even then, I can see a world where we could let it go, because people sometimes just misspeak, public setting or not.

But in this current case, the speaker's political background fits the interpretation perfectly, so I don't think that we need to explain it away.

1 comments

It is most certainly not the literal interpretation.
I agree, I misspoke. It's not the literal interpretation, it's the interpretation of what was being said, in the context of the speaker.