|
|
|
|
|
by troupo
277 days ago
|
|
> What it isn't is fundamentally true or revealing. Well, they are not a solution to transport problems, or to traffic jams. Yes, they can be complementary to other types of transportation. Yes, companies will enshittify them beyond measure if/when they reach a certain proportion of cars. > It's recognising that humans have diverse and varying needs for interaction and privacy. No. I don't think this was even uttered by any of these companies. Waymo claims to be committed to safety: https://waymo.com/about/ Tesla: stress and safety https://www.tesla.com/fsd Zoox: purpose-built taxi shaping the future of transportation https://zoox.com/about |
|
Nor to world hunger.
> companies will enshittify them beyond measure
A hypothetical applicable to every mode of transit, private and public.
> don't think this was even uttered by any of these companies
Things can be true without being in a corporate press release. (Also, you're the one who originally argued these services' "entire social context is 'never encounter another human as you go from A to B'." If not being in a press release is an argument against one, it 's an argument against the other.)
Though, in this case, it has been said: "Waymo gives you your own personal space to focus on more meaningful things" [1].
[1] https://waymo.com/rides/