| >California schools generally score right at or just below the median for the entire US. I'm guessing you're referring to the statement above from the comment here[0]. Is that correct? I read that as "[All] The schools in California [in aggregate] generally score right at or just below the median for [other states' schools in aggregate] for the entire US." Which is as Tyr42 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191847 ) interpreted it as well. Perhaps I misunderstood, but I don't believe I've ever seen comparisons of individual schools across the US. Ever. It's always comparisons of all the schools in one state as compared with those in another state. Sure, there are often comparisons within states between school districts or between schools in the same district, but never one-to-one comparisons of a single school in one state vs. all the other schools in the US. But yes, i can see how you might read it that way. That said, I guess we won't know which GP meant unless they come back and tell us. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45190611 Edit: Clarified comparison examples within within states/between school districts/schools. |
That is how I intended it as, like you, I have never seen anything else.
However, the real comment I was refuting was "This is in California where the test scores are some of the worst in the nation." That statement simply isn't supported by the data.
It is certainly possible that California does have some of the worst individual districts in the nation as it definitely has pockets of incredibly poor socioeconomic areas. However, that does not define "California schools" as an aggregate any more than the fact that California has some of the highest individually performing schools in the country by virtue of demographics as well.