|
|
|
|
|
|
by rus20376
285 days ago
|
|
|
> pay a developer to build them a house I seriously doubt anyone living in an RV has a plot of land in Palo Alto that they are forbidden to develop. Is it just boiled down to the sentiment that you want to "stick to the rich!" by forcing the government to bulldoze their communities? |
|
|
Sigh, I didn't mean that literally. Of course what I actually meant was: if housing policy allows for building more housing, with less friction, and less unnecessary cost, developers will naturally build more, and faster, because there's demand, and then people won't have to live in RVs, because there will be housing units available than they can afford.
> Is it just boiled down to the sentiment that you want to "stick to the rich!" by forcing the government to bulldoze their communities?
Wow, not what I said, and not what I think. If you're going to continue to take the most uncharitable interpretations of what I say, I don't really think there's much point in continuing to participate in this discussion.
There's plenty of land in all these places. No need to bulldoze anything. And not sure why you keep bringing up "the government". The government won't be doing anything except making it easier and more affordable to build housing.