Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pointyfence 288 days ago
Charlie was pretty big on Gelsinger. And he is big on Holthaus.

Perhaps this says more about Charlie than Intel.

1 comments

I'm not sure I understand. Is the suggestion that Charlie is wrong here?
One CEO is gone mainly because he thought that he could home run his way back to prominence with a "Fabs to Nowhere" strategy which has crippled the company's finances.

One "Product CEO" had a material chunk of her responsibilities re-allocated to Tan after he came on board with him frequently saying that their product roadmap has been subpar.

Thank you kindly for clarifying! I get it now.