[kelipso]

Isn’t it usually the opposite you are supposed to do? LLM output and make sure it is factual because LLMs cannot tell what is factual or not?

I can’t even get myself to read what you “wrote” because of the LLM tinge though lol.

[Apes]

It seems odd that you're fixated on the tool used rather than the content itself. Do you refuse to wear clothes because a machine made them?

[kentm]

Machines don’t typically make clothes that are not wearable. An LLM will produce content that is incorrect.

[kelipso]

Because I don’t have to waste my valuable time and mental energy to check the knitting before I wear them.

Hey I review and use LLM code slop as much as the next programmer, and I use it for lots of topics too, but I am not spending a second on reviewing LLM slop output on HN comments. Honestly it’s somewhat insulting that you expect me to.

[kotaKat]

No, I refuse to read arrogant slop that someone had to shove through a machine because they can’t think or write for themselves anymore.