|
|
|
|
|
by motorest
289 days ago
|
|
> It’s… not a part of the langage which mandates a default ctor in the first place. Why should it, tough? Think about it. The goal of move semantics is performance, mainly avoiding to copy/initialize expensive objects using a standard syntax. Why do you believe it would be a good idea to force constructors when they can very well be the reason why move should be used? |
|