Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by youknow123 287 days ago
They needed private IP ranges that wouldn't conflict with the real internet. 192.168 was just sitting there unused, so they grabbed it along with 10.x.x.x and 172.16-31.x.x.
1 comments

Read the article rather than making something up.
It isn't an article, but a mailing list post, and the post starts out with:

  This is a fuzzy recollection of something I believe I read, which might well be inaccurate, and for which I can find no corroboration.  I mention it solely because it might spark memories from someone who actually knows:
Spoiler: it sparks one memory from one person, who winds up being mistaken.

Offering an alternative hypothesis seems reasonable given the content of the post.

Which article? The posted emails? Superuser audience disagree https://superuser.com/questions/784978/why-did-the-ietf-spec...
That’s such an awesome answer by Michael Hampton. I had never heard of Jon Postel before now.
Narrator: noone came up with an answer. Someone purported the origin to be Sun but it turned out they used a different address in examples.
And what did you learn from what article, actually?