Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stavros 287 days ago
Given that there used to be plenty of room to overclock the cores while still keeping them stable, I think it was more "performance on the table".
1 comments

You could also get the idea that vendors sometimes make strange decisions which increase neither performance nor reliability.

For example, various brands of motherboards are / were known to basically blow up AMD CPUs when using AMP/XMP, with the root cause being that they jacked an uncore rail way up. Many people claimed they did this to improve stability, but overclockers now that that rail has a sweet spot for stability and they went way beyond it (so much so that the actual silicon failed and burned a hole in itself with some low-ish probability).